|
Vote No on SB1
Senate Bill 1 would take Kentucky education a giant step backward by replacing CATS with an off-the-shelf national norm referenced test, removing all requirements that students be able to analyze data, solve problems, and communicate their reasoning. This bill would lower Kentucky’s goals and “dumb down” our testing. Help us stop this proposal by contacting members of the Senate Education Committee today. Please tell legislators to vote NO on Senate Bill 1. Tell them it would lower Kentucky’s standards and mean our children are less prepared for work and citizenship. It’s the wrong direction for Kentucky.
| Sample Letter for Campaign |
Subject: Vote NO on SB1
Dear [ Decision Maker ] ,
Vote NO on Senate Bill 1.
Kentucky should assess high state standards, not switch to norm-referenced testing that compares our students to average performance elsewhere. Likewise, we should continue to expect students to do their own analysis and explain their own thinking, not settle for purely multiple-choice testing.
Further, SB 1 would burden teachers who are already responding to major Core Content and testing changes. Our schools need to focus on moving toward 2014 proficiency, rather than handling another testing upheaval.
CATS costs are just one quarter of one percent of state education spending, so there is no financial justification for a change that will confuse our schools, lower our standards, and weaken our children's futures.
Accordingly, I ask that you oppose Senate Bill 1, because it would move our assessment system, our schools, and our students in the wrong direction.
Sincerely,
|
Campaign Launched: February 26, 2008
|
Senate Bill 1 would change Kentucky’s assessment and accountability system by requiring only multiple choice questions and eliminating all testing where students have to do their own analysis and explain their own thinking. Both open-response questions and portfolio writing would be abandoned. SB1 would use an off-the-shelf national norm-referenced test as the main assessment: the kind that compares each student to a group of other kids and charts them on a bell curve. Overall, the bill would lower Kentucky’s standards and ensure that our children are less prepared for a successful future.
Arts, humanities, pratical living and vocational studies would no longer be a part of accountability. That would be another reduction in what we prepare our students to know and be able to do, and hard to square with Kentucky's constitutional expectation that schools will work to deliver that knowledge for each and every child.
SB1 would disrupt our schools. Teachers are still working through the major revisions to Kentucky Core Content for Assessment, added elementary testing for No Child Left Behind, and added readiness testing in grades 8, 10, and 11 (the Explore, Plan, and ACT tests). They need and deserve time to complete that process and deliver for students on the standards already before them. Finally, Kentucky spends about $15 a student for CATS, which measures our own Kentucky standards. This is a fraction of what the state spends per pupil ( less than twenty-five one-hundredths of one percent) and less than 25% of the cost of a single textbook. It’s far too small a savings for a bill that will confuse our schools, lower our standards, and weaken our children’s futures.
Senate Bill 1 would dramatically change Kentucky’s assessment and accountability system in ways the Prichard Committee does not support.
Click here for a summary of implications of the bill.
|